(Redirected from Borobodur) 'Borobudur' is a
ninth century Buddhist Mahayana monument in
Central Java,
Indonesia. The monument comprises six square platforms topped by three circular platforms, and is decorated with 2,672
relief panels and 504
Buddha statues.
[1] A main dome is located at the center of the top platform, and is surrounded by seventy-two Buddha statues seated inside perforated
stupa.
The monument is both a
shrine to the
Lord Buddha and a place for Buddhist
pilgrimage. The journey for pilgrims begins at the base of the monument and follows a path circumambulating the monument while ascending to the top through the three levels of
Buddhist cosmology, namely, ''
Kamadhatu'' (the world of desire); ''
Rupadhatu'' (the world of forms); and ''
Arupadhatu'' (the world of formless). During the journey, the monument guides the pilgrims through a system of stairways and corridors with 1,460 narrative relief panels on the wall and the
balustrades.
Evidence suggests Borobudur was abandoned following the
fourteenth century decline of Buddhist and
Hindu kingdoms in Java, and the
Javanese conversion to
Islam.
[2] It was rediscovered in
1814 by
Sir Thomas Raffles, the
British ruler of Java. Borobudur has since been preserved through several restorations. The largest restoration project was undertaken between 1975 and 1982 by the
Indonesian government and
UNESCO, following which the monument was listed as a UNESCO
World Heritage Site.
[3] Borobudur is still used for pilgrimage, and once a year Buddhists in Indonesia celebrate
Vesak at the monument. It is Indonesia's single most visited
tourist attraction.
[4][5][6]
Etymology
In
Indonesian, temples are known as ''candi''. The term is also used more loosely to describe any ancient structure, for example, gates and bathing structures. The origins of the name ''Borobudur'' are unclear,
[7] although the original names of most ancient Indonesian temples are no longer known.
The name 'Borobudur' was first written in the
Sir Thomas Raffles book on Java history.
[8] Raffles wrote about a monument called ''borobudur'', but there are no older documents suggesting the same name.
[7] The only
old Javanese manuscript that hints at the monument is
Nagarakertagama, written by
Mpu Prapanca in AD 1365, which mentions ''Budur'' as a Buddhist sanctuary. It is likely that it is associated with Borobudur, but the manuscript lacks any further information to make a definite identification.
The name 'Bore-Budur', and thus 'BoroBudur', is thought to have been written by Raffles in
English grammar to mean the nearby village of Bore; most ''candi'' are named after a nearby village. If it followed
Javanese language, the monument should have been named 'BudurBoro'. Raffles also suggested that 'Budur' might correspond to the modern Javanese word ''Buda'' ('ancient') - i.e., 'ancient Boro'.
Another hypothesis says that 'Boro' was taken from an old Javanese term ''bhara'' ('honourable'), describing the monument as "The Honourable Buddha". Another interpretation comes from the Javanese word ''biara'' ('
monastery'), or 'monastery of Budur'.
Location
A number of
Buddhist and
Hindu temple compounds are located approximately 40 km (25 miles) northwest of
Yogyakarta, on an elevated area between two twin volcanoes,
Sundoro-
Sumbing and
Merbabu-
Merapi, and the Progo river. According to local myth, the area known as
Kedu Plain is a Javanese
'sacred' place and has been dubbed 'the garden of Java' due to its high
agricultural fertility.
[10] During the first restoration, it was discovered that three Buddhist temples in the region, Borobudur,
Pawon and
Mendut, are in one straight line position.
[11] It might be accidental, but the temples' alignment is in conjunction with a native
folk tale that a long time ago, there was a brick-paved road from Borobodur to Mendut with walls on both sides.
Unlike other temples, which are built on a flat surface, Borobudur was built on a bedrock hill, 265 m (869 ft)
above sea level and 15 m (49 ft) above the floor of the dried-out paleolake.
[12] The lake's existence was the subject of intense discussion among archaeologists in the
twentieth century; Borobudur was thought to have been built on a lake shore or even floated on a lake. In 1931, a Dutch artist and a scholar of Hindu and
Buddhist architecture, W.O.J. Nieuwenkamp, developed a theory that Kedu Plain was once a lake and Borobudur initially represented a
lotus flower floating on the lake.
Lotus flowers are found in almost every Buddhist work of art, often serving as a throne for buddhas and base for stupas. The architecture of Borobudur itself suggests a lotus depiction, in which Buddha postures in Borobudur symbolize the
Lotus Sutra, mostly found in many
Mahayana Buddhism (a school of Buddhism widely spread in
southeast and
east Asia regions) texts. Three circular platforms on the top are also thought to represent a lotus leaf.
Nieuwenkamp's theory, however, was contested by many archaeologists because the natural environment surrounding the monument is a dry land.
Geologists, on the other hand, support Nieuwenkamp's view, pointing out
clay sediments found near the site.
[13] A study of
stratigraphy, sediment and
pollen samples conducted in 2000 supports the existence of a paleolake environment near Borobudur,
which corroborates the doubts had raised by archaeologists. The lake area, however, fluctuated with time; a study also proves that Borobudur was near the lake shore circa
thirteenth and
fourteenth century. River flows and
volcanic activities shape the surrounding landscape, including the lake. One of the most active volcanoes in Indonesia, Mount Merapi, is in the direct vicinity of Borobudur and has been very active since the
Pleistocene.
[14]
History
Construction

Buddhist pilgrims meditate on the top platform.
There is no written record of who built Borobudur, or of its intended purpose.
[15] The construction time is estimated by comparison between
carved reliefs on the temple's hidden foot and the
inscriptions commonly used in royal charters during the eight and ninth centuries. It is likely Borobudur was founded around
AD 800.
This corresponds to the period between AD 760–830, the peak of the
Sailendra dynasty in Central Java.
[16], when it was under the influence of the
Srivijayan Empire. The construction is estimated to have taken 75 years and was completed in 825, during the reign of Srivijayan Maharaja
Samaratunga.
[17][18]
There is confusion between
Hindu and
Buddhist rulers in
Java around that time. The Sailendras are known as ardent followers of Lord Buddha, although stone inscriptions found at
Sojomerto suggest they were Hindus.
It was during this time that many Hindu and Buddhist monuments were built on the plains and mountain around the Kedu Plain. The Buddhist monuments, including Borobudur, were erected around the same time as the Hindu
Shiva Prambanan temple compound. In AD 732, king
Sanjaya, the founder of the Sailendra dynasty, commissioned a Hindu Shiva ''lingga'' sanctuary to be built on the Ukir hill, only 10 km (6.2 miles) east of Borobudur. Sanjaya's immediate successor,
Rakai Panangkaran, was associated with a Buddhist
Kalasan temple, as shown in the
Kalasan Charter dated AD 778.
Anthropologists believe that religion in Java has never been a serious conflict.
[19] It was possible for a Hindu king to patronize the establishment of a Buddhist monument; or for a Buddhist king to act likewise.
The official religion could take place without affecting the continuity of a dynasty and of cultural life.
Abandonment

Borobudur stupas overlooking a shadowy mountain of Java. For centuries, it has been deserted.
For centuries, Borobudur lay hidden under layers of
volcanic ash and jungle growth. The facts behind the desertion of the monument remain a mystery. It is not known when active use of the monument and Buddhist pilgrimage to it ceased. One assumption is that the temples were disbanded when the population converted to
Islam in the
fifteenth century.
[20] Another theory is that a
famine caused by a volcanic eruption (est. circa AD 1006) forced local inhabitants to leave their lands and the monument.
The event was said to trigger the movement of Javanese power from the Kedu Plain area to the east of Java nearby the
Brantas valley as early as AD 928.
However, the great monument was never completely removed from the local people's memory. Instead of glorifying stories of the monument, memories gradually shifted into more
superstitious beliefs that were associated with bad luck and misery. Two
old Javanese manuscripts from the eighteenth century mention a case of bad luck associated with the monument; according to the
Babad Tanah Jawi (or the History of Java), the monument was a fatal factor for a rebel who revolted against the king of
Mataram in AD 1709.
[2] The hill was besieged and the insurgents were defeated and sentenced to death by the king. In the
Babad Mataram (or the History of the Mataram Kingdom), the monument was associated with the misfortune of the crown prince of the
Yogyakarta Sultanate in AD 1757.
[22] In spite of a restriction to visit the monument, he took what is written as ''the knight who was captured in a cage'' (a statue in one of the perforated stupas). As soon as he arrived at his palace, he died unexpectedly after a one-day illness.
Rediscovery
Following the
Anglo-Dutch Java War, Java was under British administration from 1811 to 1816. The appointed governor was Lieutenant
Governor-General Thomas Stamford Raffles, who had a great interest in the history of Java. He collected Javan antiques and made notes through contacts with local inhabitants during his tour throughout the island. On an inspection tour to
Semarang in 1814, he was informed about a big monument called Chandi Borobudur deep in a jungle near the village of Bumisegoro.
He was not able to make the discovery himself and he sent
H.C. Cornellius, a Dutch engineer, to investigate.
In two months, Cornellius and his 200 men cut down trees, burned down vegetation and dug away the earth to reveal the monument. Due to the danger of collapse, he could not unearth all galleries. He reported his findings to Raffles including various drawings. Although the discovery is only mentioned by a few sentences, Raffles has been credited with the monument's recovery and bringing it to the world's attention.
Hartmann, a Dutch administrator of the Kedu region, continued Cornellius' work and in 1835 the whole monument was finally unearthed. His interest in Borobudur was more personal rather than official. Hartmann did not, however, write any reports of his activities; in particular, the alleged story that he discovered the large statue of Buddha in the main stupa.
[23] The main stupa is empty. In 1842, Hartmann investigated the main dome although what he discovered remains unknown. The
Dutch East Indies government then commissioned a Dutch engineering official,
F.C. Wilsen, who in 1853, reported a large Buddha statue the size of one hundred other Borobudur statues.
Besides making hundreds of relief sketches, Wilsen studied the monument itself, preparing three articles on it. The Dutch East Indies government, meanwhile, had appointed J.F.G. Brumund to make a detail study of the monument, which was completed in 1859. Brumund intended to publish an article supplemented by Wilsen's drawings. The colonial government, however, decided otherwise and Brumund subsequently refused to cooperate. The government then commissioned another scholar,
C. Leemans, who compiled a
monograph based on Brumund's and Wilsen's sources. In 1873, the first monograph of the detailed study of Borobudur was published, followed by its French translation a year later.
The first photograph of the monument was taken in 1873 by a Dutch-
Flemish engraver,
Isidore van Kinsbergen.
[24]
Appreciation of the site developed slowly. Some reliefs and ornaments were routinely removed by thieves and souvenir hunters. In 1882, the chief inspector of cultural artefacts recommended that Borobudur be entirely disassembled with the reliefs placed in museums due to the unstable condition of the monument.
The government then appointed an
archeologist, Groenveldt, to undertake a thorough investigation of the site and assess the actual condition of the monument. The report found that the fears over its condition were unjustified and recommended the monument be left intact.
Contemporary events

Tourists in Borobudur.
Following the major 1973 renovation funded by
UNESCO,
Borobudur is once again used as a
place of worship and pilgrimage. Once a year, during the
full moon in May or June, Buddhists in Indonesia observe
Vesak (
Indonesian: ''Waisak'') day commemorating the birth, death, and the time when Siddhārtha Gautama attained the highest wisdom to become the
Buddha Shakyamuni. Vesak is an official
national holiday in Indonesia
[25] and the ceremony is centered at the three Buddhist temples by walking from
Mendut to
Pawon and ending at Borobudur.
[26]
The monument is visited daily by tourists and is the single most visited
tourist attraction in Indonesia. In 1974, 260,000 tourists of whom 36,000 were foreigners visited the monument.
[5] The figure hiked into 2.5 million visitors annually (80% were domestic tourists) in the mid
1990s, before
the country's economy crisis.
[6] Tourism development, however, has been criticized for not including the local community on which occasional local conflict has arisen.
In 2003, residents and small businesses around Borobudur organized several meetings and poetry protests, objecting to a provincial government plan to build a three-story mall complex, dubbed 'Java World'.
[29]
On
21 January 1985, nine stupas were badly damaged by nine bombs.
[30] In 1991, a blind
Muslim evangelist, Husein Ali Al Habsyie, was sentenced to
life imprisonment for masterminding a series of bombings in the mid 1980s including the temple attack.
[31] Two other members of a right-wing
extremist group that carried out the bombings were each sentenced to 20 years in 1986 and another man received a 13-year prison term. On
27 May 2006, an
earthquake of 6.2 magnitude on
Richter scale struck the south coast of Central Java. The event had caused severe damage around the region and casualties to the nearby city of
Yogyakarta, but Borobudur, however, was intact.
[32]
Architecture

Borobudur ground plan
Borobudur is built as a single large
stupa, and when viewed from above takes the form of a giant
tantric Buddhist ''
mandala'', simultaneously representing the Buddhist cosmology and the nature of mind.
[25] The foundation is a square, approximately 118 metres (387 ft) on each side. It has nine platforms, of which the lower six are
square and the upper three are
circular. The upper platform features seventy-two small stupas surrounding one large central stupa. Each stupa is bell-shaped and pierced by numerous decorative openings. Statues of the
Buddha sit inside the pierced enclosures.
Approximately 55,000 m³ (almost 2 million
cubic feet) of stones were taken from neighbouring rivers to build the monument.
The stone was cut to size, transported to the site and laid without
mortar. Knobs, indentations and
dovetails were used to form joints between stones.
Reliefs were created ''
in-situ'' after the building had been completed.
The monument is equipped with a good
drainage system to cater for the area's high
stormwater run-off. To avoid innundation, 100 spouts are provided at each corner with a unique carved
gargoyles (''makaras'').

A carved spout (''makaras'') for water drainage.
Borobudur differs markedly with the general design of other structures built for this purpose. Instead of building on a flat surface, Borobudur is built on a natural hill. The building technique is, however, similar to other temples in Java. With no inner space as in other temples and its general design similar to the shape of
pyramid, Borobudur was first thought more likely to have served as a ''stupa'', instead of a temple (or ''candi'' in
Indonesian).
[34] A ''stupa'' is intended as a
shrine for the Lord Buddha. Sometimes stupas were built only as devotional symbols of Buddhism. A temple, on the other hand, is used as a house of
deity and have inner spaces for worship. The complexity, however, of the monument's meticulous design suggests it is in fact a temple. Congregational worship in Borobudur is performed by means of pilgrimage. Pilgrims were guided by the system of staircases and corridors ascending to the top platform. Each platform represents one stage of
enlightment. The path that guides pilgrims was designed with the symbolism of sacred knowledge according to the
Buddhism cosmology.
[35]

Half cross-section with 4:6:9 height ratio for foot, body and head, respectively.
Little is known about the architect
Gunadharma.
[36] His name is actually recounted from Javanese legendary folk tales rather than written in old inscriptions. He was said to be one who "... bears the measuring rod, knows division and thinks himself composed of parts."
The basic unit measurement he used during the construction was called ''tala'', defined as the length of a human face from the forehead's hairline to the tip of the chin or the distance from the tip of the thumb to the tip of the middle finger when both fingers are stretched at their maximum distance.
[37] The unit metrics is then obviously relative between persons, but the monument has exact measurements. A survey conducted in 1977 revealed frequent findings of a ratio of 4:6:9 around the monument. The architect had used the formula to lay out the precise dimensions of Borobudur.
The identical ratio formula was further found in the nearby Buddhist temples of Pawon and Mendhut. Archeologists conjectured the purpose of the ratio formula and the ''tala'' dimension has calendrical, astronomical and cosmological themes, as of the case in other Buddhist temple of
Angkor Wat in
Cambodia.

A narrow corridor with reliefs on the wall.
The main vertical structure can be divided into three groups: base (or foot), body, and top, which resembles the three major division of a human body.
The base is a 123x123 m² square in size and 4 metres (13 ft) high of walls.
The body is composed of five square platforms each with diminishing heights. The first terrace is set back 7 metres (23 ft) from the edge of the base. The other terraces are set back by 2 metres (6.5 ft), leaving a narrow corridor at each stage. The top consists of 3 circular platforms, with each stage supporting a row of perforated ''
stupas'', arranged in
concentric circles. There is one main dome at the center; the top of which is the highest point of the monument (35 metres or 115 ft above ground level). Access to the upper part is through stairways at the centre of each side with a number of gates, watched by a total of 32 lion statues. The main entrance is at the eastern side, the location of the first narrative reliefs. On the slopes of the hill, there are also stairways linking the monument to the low-lying plain.
The three monument's division symbolizes three stages of mental preparation towards the ultimate goal according to the Buddhism cosmology, namely ''
Kamadhatu'' (the world of desires), ''
Rupadhatu'' (the world of forms), and finally ''
Arupadhatu'' (the formless world).
[38] ''Kamadhatu'' is represented by the base, ''Rupadhatu'' by the five square platforms (the body), and ''Arupadhatu'' by the three circular platforms and the large topmost stupa. The architectural features between three stages have methaporical differences. For instance, square and detailed decorations in the ''Rupadhatu'' disappear into plainless circular platforms in the ''Arupadhatu'' to represent how the world of forms - where men are still attached with forms and names - changes into the world of the formless.
[39]
In 1885, a hidden structure under the base was accidentally discovered.
[40] The "hidden foot" contains reliefs, 160 of which are narrative describing the real ''Kamadhatu''. The remaining reliefs are panels with short inscriptions that apparently describe instruction for the sculptors, illustrating the scene to be carved.
[41] An encasement base hides the real base of which its functions remains a mystery. It was first thought that the real base had to be covered to prevent a disastrous subsidence of the monument through the hill.
There is another theory that the encasement base was added because the original hidden foot was incorrectly designed, according to
Vastu Shastra, the Indian ancient book about
architecture and
town planning.
The encasement base, however, was built with detailed and meticulous design with
aesthetics and religious compensation.
Reliefs
| Narrative Panels Distribution[42] |
|---|
| section | location | story | #panels |
|---|---|---|---|
| hidden foot | wall | Karmavibhangga | 160 |
| first gallery | main wall | Lalitavistara | 120 |
| Jataka/Avadana | 120 |
| balustrade | Jataka/Avadana | 372 |
| Jataka/Avadana | 128 |
| second gallery | main wall | Gandavyuha | 128 |
| ballustrade | Jataka/Avadana | 100 |
| third gallery | main wall | Gandavyuha | 88 |
| ballustrade | Gandavyuha | 88 |
| fourth gallery | main wall | Gandavyuha | 84 |
| ballustrade | Gandavyuha | 72 |
| Total | 1,460 |
Borobudur contains approximately 2,670 individual
bas reliefs (1,460 narrative and 1,212 decorative panels), which cover the
façades and
balustrades. The total relief surface is 2,500 m² and they are distributed at the hidden foot (''Kamadhatu'') and the five square platforms (''Rupadhatu'').
The narrative panels, which tell the story of
Sudhana and Manohara,
[43] are grouped into 11 series encircled the monument with the total length of 3,000 metres (1.86 miles). The hidden foot contains the first series with 160 narrative panels and the remaining 10 series are distributed throughout walls and balustrades in four galleries starting from the eastern entrance stairway to the left. Narrative panels on the wall read from right to left, while on the balustrade read from left to right. This conforms with ''
pradaksina'', the ritual of circumambulation performed by
pilgrims who move in a clockwise direction while keeping the
sanctuary to their right.
[Soekmono (1976), page 21.]
The hidden foot depicts the story of the
karma law. The walls of the first gallery have two superimposed series of reliefs; each consists of 120 panels. The upper part depicts the
biography of Buddha, while the lower part of the wall and also ballustrades in the first and the second galleries tell the story of Buddha's former lives.
[Soekmono (1976), page 20.] The remaining panels are devoted to Sudhana's further wandering about his search; terminated by his attainment of the
Perfect Wisdom.
The law of karma (Karmavibhangga)
The 160 hidden panels do not form a continuous story, but each panel provides one complete illustration of
cause and effect.
There are depictions of blameworthy activities, from gossip to murder, with their corresponding punishments. There are also praiseworthy activities, that include
charity and pilgrimage to sanctuaries, and their subsequent rewards. The pains of hell and the pleasure of heaven are also illustrated. There are scenes of daily life, complete with the full panorama of ''
samsara'' (the endless cycle of birth and death).
The birth of Buddha (Lalitavistara)

One relief on a corridor wall.
The story starts from the glorious descent of the
Lord Buddha from the
Tushita heaven, and ends with his first sermon in the Deer Park near
Benares.
The relief shows the birth of Buddha as
Prince Siddharta, son of
King Suddhodana and
Queen Maya of
Kapilavastu (in present-day
Nepal).
The story is preceded by 27 panels showing various preparations, in heavens and on earth, to welcome the final incarnation of
Bodhisattva.
Before descending from Tushita heaven, Bodhisattva entrusted his crown to his successor, the future
Buddha Maitreya. He descended on earth in the shape of
white elephants with six
tusks, penetrated to Queen Maya's right womb. Queen Maya had a dream of this event, which was interpreted that his son would become either a sovereign or a Buddha.
While Queen Maya felt that it was the time to give the birth, she went to the
Lumbini park outside the Kapilavastu city. She stood under a
plaksa tree, holding one branch with her right hand and she gave birth to a son, Prince Siddharta. The story on the panels continues until the prince became Buddha.

A detailed carved relief stone.
Prince Siddharta story (Jataka) and other legendary persons (Avadana)
Jatakas are stories about the Buddha before he was born as Prince Siddharta.
[44] Avadanas are similar with jatakas, but the main figure is not Bodhisattva himself. The saintly deeds in avadanas are attributed to other legendary persons. Jatakas and avadanas are treated in one and the same series in the reliefs of Borobudur.
The first 20 lower panels in the first gallery on the wall depict the ''
Sudhanakumaravadana'' or the saintly deeds of Prince Sudhanakumara. The first 135 upper panels in the same gallery on the balustrades are devoted to the 34 legends of the ''
Jatakamala''.
[45] The remaining 237 panels depict stories from other sources, as do for the lower series and panels in the second gallery. Some jatakas stories are depicted twice, for example the story of
King Sibhi.
Sudhana search of the Ultimate Truth (Gandavyuha)
Gandavyuha is the story told in the final chapter of the
Avatamsaka Sutra about
Sudhana's tireless wandering in search of the Highest Perfect Wisdom. It covers two galleries (third and fourth) and also half of the second gallery; comprising in total of 460 panels.
[46] The principal figure of the story, the youth Sudhana, son of an extremely rich merchant, appears on the 16th panel. The preceding 15 panels form a
prologue to the story of the miracles during Buddha's ''
samadhi'' in the
Garden of Jeta at
Sravasti.
During his search, Sudhana visited no less than 30 teachers but none of them had satisfied him completely. He was then instructed by
Manjusri to meet the
monk Megasri, where he was given the first
doctrine. Sudhana journey continues to meet in the following order Supratisthita, the
physician Megha (Spirit of Knowledge), the
banker Muktaka, the monk Saradhvaja, the
upasika Asa (Spirit of Supreme Enlightment), Bhismottaranirghosa, the
Brahmin Jayosmayatna, Princess Maitrayani, the monk Sudarsana, a boy called Indriyesvara, the upasika Prabhuta, the banker Ratnachuda,
King Anala, the god
Siva Mahadeva,
Queen Maya,
Bodhisattva Maitreya and then back to Manjusri. Each meeting has given Sudhana a specific doctrine, knowledge and wisdom. These meetings are shown in the third gallery.
After the last meeting with Manjusri, Sudhana went to the residence of
Bodhisattva Samantabhadra; depicted in the fourth gallery. The entire series of the fourth gallery is devoted to the teaching of Samantabhadra. The narrative panels finally end with the Sudhana's achievement of the Supreme Knowledge and the Ultimate Truth.
[47]
Buddha statues

A Buddha statue with the hand position of ''
dharmachakra mudra'' (turning the Wheels of the Law).
Apart from the story of
Buddhist cosmology carved in stones, Borobudur has many Buddha statues. The cross-legged Buddha statues are seated with
lotus position. They are distributed on the five square platforms (the ''Rupadhatu'' level) and on the top platform (the ''Arupadhatu'' level).
The Buddha statues are in niches at the ''Rupadhatu'' level, arranged in rows on the outer sides of the balustrades. As platforms progressively diminish to the upper level, the number of Buddha statues are decreasing. The first balustrades have 104 niches, the second 104, the third 88, the fourth 72 and the fifth 64. In total, there are 432 Buddha status at the ''Rupadhatu'' level.
[1] At the ''Arupadhatu'' level (or the three circular platforms), Buddha statues are placed inside perforated
stupas. The first circular platform has 32 stupas, the second 24 and the third 16, that sum up to 72 stupas.
Of the total 504 Buddha statues, over 300 are mutilated (mostly headless) and 43 are completely missing.

A headless Buddha statue inside a stupa.
At glance, all Buddha statues are equal, but there is subtle difference between them in the ''
mudras'' or the position of the hands. There are 5 groups of ''mudra'': North, East, South, West and Zenith, which represent the five cardinal compass according to
Mahayana. The first four balustrades have the first four ''mudras'': North, East, South and West, of which Buddha statues that face one compass direction has the corresponding ''mudra''. Buddha statues at the fifth balustrades and inside the 72 stupas on the top platform have the same ''mudra'':
Zenith. Each ''mudra'' represent one of the
Five Dhyani Buddhas; each has its own symbolism.
[49] They are ''Abhaya mudra'' for
Amogashiddi (north), ''Vara mudra'' for
Ratnasambhava (south), ''Dhyana mudra'' for
Amitabha (west), ''Bhumisparsa mudra'' for
Aksobhya (east) and ''
Dharmachakra mudra'' for
Vairochana (zenith).
Restoration
Borobudur attracted attention in 1885, when Yzerman, the Chairman of the Archaeological Society in Yogyakarta, made a discovery about the ''hidden foot''.
Photographs that reveal reliefs on the hidden foot were made in 1890–1891.
[50] The discovery has led the
Dutch East Indies government to take a necessary step to safeguard the monument. In 1900, the government set up a commission consisted of three officials to assess the monument: Brandes, an
art historian, Theodoor van Erp, a
Dutch army engineer officer, and Van de Kamer, a construction engineer from the Department of Public Works.
In 1902, the commission submitted a threefold plan of proposal to the government. First, the immediate dangers should be avoided by resetting the corners, removing stones that endangers the adjacent parts, strengthening the first balustrades and restoring several niches, archways, stupas and the main dome. Second, fencing off the courtyards, providing proper maintenance and improving drainage by restoring floors and spouts. Third, all loose stones should be removed, cleared up the monument up to the first balustrades, removed disfigured stones and restored the main dome. The total cost was estimated at that time around 48,800
Dutch guilders.

A technique to improve Borobudur's drainage system during the 1973 restoration by embedding
concrete and
pvc pipe.
The restoration then was carried out between 1907–1911, using the principles of
anastylosis and led by Theodor van Erp.
[51] The first seven months of his restoration was excavating the grounds around the monument to find missing Buddha heads and panel stones. Van Erp dismantled and rebuilt the upper three circular platforms and stupas. Along the way, Van Erp discovered more things to improve the monument that he submitted another proposal that was agreed with the additional cost of 34,600 guilders. At first glance Borobudur had been restored to its old glory.
Due to the limited budget, the restoration had been primarily focused on cleaning the sculptures, but Van Erp did not solve the drainage problem. Within fifteen years, the gallery walls were sagging and the reliefs showed signs of new cracks and deterioration.
Van Erp used concrete from which
alkali salts and
calcium hydroxide are leached and transported into the rest of the construction. This has caused some problems that a further thorough renovation is urgently needed.
Small restorations have been performed since then, but not for a complete protection. In the late 1960s, the Indonesian government had requested a major renovation to protect the monument to the
international community. In 1973, a master plan to restore Borobudur was created.
[52] The Indonesian government and
UNESCO then undertook the complete overhaul of the monument in a big restoration project between 1975–1982.
The foundation was stabilized and all 1,460 panels were cleaned. The restoration involved the dismantling of the five square platforms and improved the drainage by embedding water channels into the monument. Both impermeable and filter layers were added. This colossal project involved around 600 people to restore the monument and cost in total of
US$ 6,901,243.
[25] After the renovation was finished, UNESCO listed Borobudur as a
World Heritage Site in 1991.
[3]
See also
★
Candi of Indonesia
★
History of Buddhism
★
Indonesian architecture
References
General References
★
Some Architectural Design Principles of Temples in Java: A study through the buildings projection on the reliefs of Borobudur temple, Parmono Atmadi, , , Gajah Mada University Press, , ISBN 979-420-085-9
★
Borobudur, Jacques Dumarçay, , , Oxford University Press, , ISBN 0-19-588550-3
★
Borobudur: Golden Tales of the Buddhas, John Miksic, , , Shambala, , ISBN 0-87773-906-4
★
★
Borobudur: A Prayer in Stone, R. Soekmono, J.G. de Casparis, J. Dumarçay, P. Amranand and P. Schoppert, , , Archipelago Press, , ISBN 2-87868-004-9
Notes
1. Soekmono (1976), page 35-36.
2. Soekmono (1976), page 4.
3. Borobudur Temple Compounds
4. Indonesia, , , , Lonely Planet Publications Pty Ltd, , ISBN 1-74059-154-2
5. Heritage, Local Communities and Economic Development, Mark P. Hampton, , , Annals of Tourism Research,
6.
7. Soekmono (1976), page 13.
8. The History of Java, Thomas Stamford Raffles, , , Oxford University Press, , ISBN 0-19-580347-7
9. Soekmono (1976), page 13.
10. Soekmono (1976), page 1.
11. Borobudur, Archaelogical Description, N. J. Krom, , , Nijhoff, ,
12. Borobudur monument (Java, Indonesia) stood by a natural lake: chronostratigraphic evidence and historical implications, Murwanto, H.; Gunnell, Y; Suharsono, S.; Sutikno, S. and Lavigne, F, , , The Holocene,
13. R.W. van Bemmelen (1949). ''The geology of Indonesia, general geology of Indonesia and adjacent archipelago, vol 1A'', The Hague, Government Printing Office, Martinus Nijhoff. cited in Murwanto (2004).
14. 10,000 Years of explosive eruptions of Merapi Volcano, Central Java: archaeological and modern implications, Newhall C.G., Bronto S., Alloway B., Banks N.G., Bahar I., del Marmol M.A., Hadisantono R.D., Holcomb R.T., McGeehin J., Miksic J.N., Rubin M., Sayudi S.D., Sukhyar R., Andreastuti S., Tilling R.I., Torley R., Trimble D., and Wirakusumah A.D., , , Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research,
15. Soekmono (1976), page 9.
16. Miksic (1990)
17. Dumarçay (1991).
18. Early Kingdoms of the Indonesian Archipelago and the Malay Peninsula, Paul Michel Munoz, , , Didier Millet, , ISBN 9814155675
19. Soekmono (1976), page 10.
20. Soekmono (1976), page 3.
21. Soekmono (1976), page 4.
22. Soekmono (1976), page 5.
23. Soekmono (1976), page 6.
24. Soekmono (1976), page 42.
25.
26. The Meaning of Procession
27. Heritage, Local Communities and Economic Development, Mark P. Hampton, , , Annals of Tourism Research,
28.
29. Battle of Borobudur
30. 1,100-Year-Old Buddhist Temple Wrecked By Bombs in Indonesia
31. The Key Determinants of Indonesia’s Political Future, Harold Crouch, , , Institute of Southeast Asian Studies,
32. An ancient wonder reduced to rubble
33.
34. Soekmono (1976), page 16.
35.
36. Borobudur: Pyramid of the Cosmic Buddha, Caesar Voûte and Mark Long, , , D.K. Printworld Ltd., ,
37. Atmadi (1988).
38. Lecture 17: Sherman Lee’s History of Far Eastern Art (Indonesia and Cambodja) Tartakov, Gary Michael
39. Soekmono (1976), page 17.
40. Borobudur Pernah Salah Design?
41. Soekmono (1976), page 18.
42. Soekmono (1976), page 20.
43. The Story of Sudhana and Manohara: An Analysis of the Texts and the Borobudur Reliefs, , P.S., Jaini, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies,
44. Soekmono (1976), page 26.
45. Soekmono (1976), page 29.
46. Soekmono (1976), page 32.
47. Soekmono (1976), page 35.
48. Soekmono (1976), page 35-36.
49. The Twilight Language: Explorations in Buddhist Meditation and Symbolism, Roderick S. Bucknell and Martin Stuart-Fox, , , Routledge, , ISBN 0700702342
50. Soekmono (1976), page 43.
51.
52. The Restoration and Conservation Project of Borobudur Temple, Indonesia. Planning: Research: Design, Caesar Voute, , , Studies in Conservation,
53.
54. Borobudur Temple Compounds
Further reading
★
Barabudur, history and significance of a Buddhist monument, Luis O. Gomez and Hiram W. Woodward, , , Asian Humanities Press, , ISBN 0-89581-151-0
★
Ageless Borobudur : Buddhist mystery in stone, decay and restoration, Mendut and Pawon, folklife in ancient Java, August J.B. Kempers, , , Servire, , ISBN 90-6077-553-8
★
The Mysteries of Borobudur, John Miksic, , , Periplus, , ISBN 962-593-198-8
★
The symbolism of the stupa, Adrian Snodgrass, , , Cornell University, , ISBN 0-87727-700-1
External links
★
Official site
★ from
Wikitravel
★
Archaeology and architecture of Borobudur
★
360° view on the World Heritage Tour
★
Australia National University's research project on Borobudur