العربية
中国
Français
Deutsch
Ελληνική
हिन्दी
Italiano
日本語
Português
Русский
EspañolBEING
:''Disambiguation: For spiritual or religious ''beingness'', see Ego (spirituality).''
In ontology, the study of 'being', being is anything that can be said to ''be'', either transcendentally or immanently.
The nature of being varies by philosophy, giving different interpretations in the frameworks of Aristotle, materialism, idealism, existentialism, Islam, and Marxism.
Some philosophers deny that the concept of "being" has any meaning at all, since we only define an object's existence by its relation to other objects, and actions it undertakes. The term "I am" has no meaning by itself; it must have an action or relation appended to it. This in turn has led to the thought that "being" and nothingness are closely related, developed in existential philosophy.
Existentialist philosophers such as Sartre, as well as continental philosophers such as Hegel and Heidegger have also written extensively on the concept of being. Hegel distinguishes between the being of objects (being in itself) and the being of people (''Geist)''. Hegel, however, did not think there was much hope for delineating a "meaning" of being, because being stripped of all predicates is simply nothing.
Heidegger, in his quest to re-pose the original pre-Socratic questions of Being (of why is there something rather than nothing), wondered at how to meaningfully ask the question of the meaning of being, since it is both the greatest, as it includes everything that is, and the least, since no particular thing can be said of it. He distinguishes between different modes of beings: a privative mode is present-at-hand, whereas beings in a fuller sense are described as ready-to-hand. The one who asks the question of Being is described as Da-sein ("there/here-being") or 'being-in-the-world.' Sartre, popularly understood as misreading Heidegger (an understanding supported by Heidegger's essay "Letter on Humanism" which responds to Sartre's famous address, "Existentialism is a Humanism"), employs modes of being in an attempt to ground his concept of freedom ontologically by distinguishing between being-in-itself and being-for-itself.
The nature of "being" has also been debated and explored in Islamic philosophy, notably by Ibn Sina, Suhrawardi, and Mulla Sadra.[1]
★ Infosphere
★ Category of being
★ Cogito ergo sum
★ Creature
★ Entity
★ Existence
★ Existentialism
★ Object (philosophy)
★ Ontology
★ Substance theory
★ Supreme being
★ Hegel, Phenomenology of Spirit
★ Heidegger, Being and Time
★ Sartre, Essays in Existentialism and Being and Nothingness
★ Pranopasana
★ Being in philosophy and linguistics
1. Iranian Personalities
In ontology, the study of 'being', being is anything that can be said to ''be'', either transcendentally or immanently.
The nature of being varies by philosophy, giving different interpretations in the frameworks of Aristotle, materialism, idealism, existentialism, Islam, and Marxism.
| Contents |
| Being in continental philosophy and existentialism |
| Being in Islamic philosophy |
| Quotes |
| See also |
| External links |
| References |
Being in continental philosophy and existentialism
Some philosophers deny that the concept of "being" has any meaning at all, since we only define an object's existence by its relation to other objects, and actions it undertakes. The term "I am" has no meaning by itself; it must have an action or relation appended to it. This in turn has led to the thought that "being" and nothingness are closely related, developed in existential philosophy.
Existentialist philosophers such as Sartre, as well as continental philosophers such as Hegel and Heidegger have also written extensively on the concept of being. Hegel distinguishes between the being of objects (being in itself) and the being of people (''Geist)''. Hegel, however, did not think there was much hope for delineating a "meaning" of being, because being stripped of all predicates is simply nothing.
Heidegger, in his quest to re-pose the original pre-Socratic questions of Being (of why is there something rather than nothing), wondered at how to meaningfully ask the question of the meaning of being, since it is both the greatest, as it includes everything that is, and the least, since no particular thing can be said of it. He distinguishes between different modes of beings: a privative mode is present-at-hand, whereas beings in a fuller sense are described as ready-to-hand. The one who asks the question of Being is described as Da-sein ("there/here-being") or 'being-in-the-world.' Sartre, popularly understood as misreading Heidegger (an understanding supported by Heidegger's essay "Letter on Humanism" which responds to Sartre's famous address, "Existentialism is a Humanism"), employs modes of being in an attempt to ground his concept of freedom ontologically by distinguishing between being-in-itself and being-for-itself.
Being in Islamic philosophy
The nature of "being" has also been debated and explored in Islamic philosophy, notably by Ibn Sina, Suhrawardi, and Mulla Sadra.[1]
Quotes
As far as we can discern, the sole purpose of human existence is to kindle a light of meaning in the darkness of mere ''being''. - Carl Jung
See also
★ Infosphere
★ Category of being
★ Cogito ergo sum
★ Creature
★ Entity
★ Existence
★ Existentialism
★ Object (philosophy)
★ Ontology
★ Substance theory
★ Supreme being
★ Hegel, Phenomenology of Spirit
★ Heidegger, Being and Time
★ Sartre, Essays in Existentialism and Being and Nothingness
★ Pranopasana
External links
★ Being in philosophy and linguistics
References
1. Iranian Personalities
This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.
psst.. try this: add to faves
Featured Companies
| Great Time Travel | |
| Sheraton Vancouver Airport Hotel | |
| Optimum 1 Travel |
Being Companies
Below is the list of travel companies in Being we have in our travel directory
- Casinos (1)
