In
realist theories of
international relations, 'bandwagoning' refers to the act of weaker
states joining a stronger
power or coalition within
balance of power politics. The term is opposed to
balancing, and unlike ''balancing'', is a relatively new term. Bandwagoning was coined by
Quincy Wright in ''A Study of War'' (
1942) and popularized by
Kenneth Waltz in ''Theory of International Politics'' (
1979) (in his work, Waltz incorrectly attributes
Stephen Van Evera with coining the term).
Bandwagoning occurs when weaker states decide that the cost of opposing a stronger power exceeds the benefits to be gained from supporting it. The stronger power may offer incentives, such as the possibility of territorial gain or trade agreements for the weaker states, to induce weaker states to join with it.
Realism predicts that states will bandwagon rarely, only when there is no possibility of building a
balancing coalition or their geography makes balancing difficult (i.e. surrounded by enemies). Bandwagoning is considered to be dangerous because it allows a rival state to gain power. A belief that bandwagoning happens more frequently is implied by the theory of
containment and by neoconservative foreign policy.
See also
★
Bandwagon
★
Bandwagon effect (also describes the origin of the phrase)
Reference
★
The Origins of Alliances, , Stephen M., Walt, Cornell University Press, ,