Discover

'Attribution of recent climate change' is the effort to scientifically ascertain mechanisms responsible for relatively recent changes observed in the Earth's climate. The effort has focused on changes observed during the period of instrumental temperature record, when records are most reliable; particularly on the last 50 years, when human activity has grown fastest and observations of the upper atmosphere have become available. The dominant mechanisms to which recent climate change has been attributed all result from human activity. They are:^[1]

★ increasing atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases

★ global changes to land surface, such as deforestation

★ increasing atmospheric concentrations of aerosols.
Recent reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report have concluded that:

★ "Most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is ''very likely'' due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations."^[2].

★ "From new estimates of the combined anthropogenic forcing due to greenhouse gases, aerosols, and land surface changes, it is ''extremely likely'' that human activities have exerted a substantial net warming influence on climate since 1750."^[3]

★ "It is ''virtually certain'' that anthropogenic aerosols produce a net negative radiative forcing (cooling influence) with a greater magnitude in the Northern Hemisphere than in the Southern Hemisphere.^[1]
The panel, which represents consensus in the scientific community, defines "very likely," "extremely likely," and "virtually certain" as indicating probabilities greater than 90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.^[1]

Contents

Key attributions

Greenhouse gases

Land use

Livestock and land use

Aerosols

Attribution of 20th century climate change

Detection vs. attribution

Scientific literature and opinion

Findings that complicate attribution to CO2

Warming sometimes leads CO2 increases

Solar variation

Footnotes

References

See also

External links

Key attributions

Greenhouse gases

Scientific consensus has identified carbon dioxide as the dominant greenhouse gas; methane and nitrous oxide are also major contributors to the greenhouse effect. The Kyoto Protocol lists these together with Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), Perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and Sulphur hexafluoride (SF6),^[6] which contribute to climate change primarily by interfering with atmospheric ozone concentrations.
The chart at right attributes greenhouse gas emissions to eight main economic sectors, of which the largest contributors are power stations (many of which burn coal or other fossil fuels), industrial processes (among which cement production is a dominant contributor^[7]), transportation fuels (generally fossil fuels), and agricultural byproducts (mainly methane from enteric fermentation and nitrous oxide from fertilizer use).

Land use

Climate change is attributed to land use for two main reasons.
While 66% of anthropogenic CO₂ emissions over the last 250 years have resulted from burning fossil fuels, 33% have resulted from changes in land use, primarily deforestation.^[8] Deforestation both reduces the amount of carbon dioxide absorbed by deforested regions and releases greenhouse gases directly, together with aerosols, through biomass burning that frequently accompanies it.
A second reason that climate change has been attributed to land use is that the terrestrial albedo is often altered by use, which leads to radiative forcing. This effect is more significant locally than globally.^[8]

Livestock and land use

Worldwide, livestock production occupies 70% of all land used for agriculture, or 30% of the land surface of the Earth.^[10]
Scientists attribute more than 18% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions to livestock and livestock-related activities such as deforestation and increasingly fuel-intensive farming practices. Specific attributions to the livestock sector include:

★ 9% of global carbon dioxide emissions

★ 35-40% of global methane emissions (chiefly due to enteric fermentation and manure)

★ 64% of global nitrous oxide emissions, chiefly as a result of fertilizer use.^[11]

Aerosols

With virtual certainty, scientific consensus has attributed various forms of climate change, chiefly cooling effects, to aerosols, which are small particles or droplets suspended in the atmosphere.^[12]
Key sources to which anthropogenic aerosols are attributed^[13] include:

★ biomass burning such as slash and burn deforestation. Aerosols produced are primarily black carbon.

★ industrial air pollution, which produces soot and airborne sulfates, nitrates, and ammonium

★ dust produced by land use effects such as desertification

Attribution of 20th century climate change

Over the past 150 years human activities have released increasing quantities of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. This has led to increases in mean global temperature, or global warming. Other human effects are relevant—for example, sulphate aerosols are believed to lead to cooling—and natural factors also contribute. According to the historical temperature record of the last century, the Earth's near-surface air temperature has risen around 0.74 ± 0.18 °Celsius (1.3 ± 0.32 °Fahrenheit).
A historically important question in climate change research has regarded the relative importance of human activity and non-anthropogenic causes during the period of instrumental record. In the 1995 second assessment report (SAR), the IPCC made the widely-quoted statement that "The balance of evidence suggests a discernible human influence on global climate". The phrase "balance of evidence" suggested the (English) common-law standard of proof required in civil as opposed to criminal courts: not as high as "beyond reasonable doubt". In 2001 the third assessment report (TAR) refined this, saying "There is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities".^[14] The 2007 fourth assessment report (WG1 AR4) strengthened this finding:

★ "Anthropogenic warming of the climate system is widespread and can be detected in temperature observations taken at the surface, in the free atmosphere and in the oceans. Evidence of the effect of external influences, both anthropogenic and natural, on the climate system has continued to accumulate since the TAR."^[15]
Over the past five decades there has been a global warming of approximately 0.65 °C (1.17 °F) at the Earth's surface (see historical temperature record). Among the possible factors that could produce changes in global mean temperature are internal variability of the climate system, external forcing, an increase in concentration of greenhouse gases, or any combination of these. Current studies indicate that the increase in greenhouse gases, most notably CO₂, is mostly responsible for the observed warming. Evidence for this conclusion includes:

★ Estimates of internal variability from climate models, and reconstructions of past temperatures, indicate that the warming is unlikely to be entirely natural.

★ Climate models forced by natural factors ''and'' increased greenhouse gases and aerosols reproduce the observed global temperature changes; those forced by natural factors alone do not [1].

★ "Fingerprint" methods indicate that the pattern of change is closer to that expected from greenhouse gas-forced change than from natural change.[2]

★ The plateau in warming from the 1940s to 1960s can be attributed largely to sulphate aerosol cooling.[3]
In 2001, the U.S. National Academy of Sciences released a report supporting the IPCC’s conclusions regarding the causes of recent climate change. It stated, "Greenhouse gases are accumulating in Earth’s atmosphere as a result of human activities, causing surface air temperatures and subsurface ocean temperatures to rise. Temperatures are, in fact, rising. The changes observed over the last several decades are likely mostly due to human activities, but we cannot rule out that some significant part of these changes are also a reflection of natural variability."[4] [5][6]

Detection vs. attribution

Detection and attribution of climate signals, as well as its common-sense meaning, has a more precise definition within the climate change literature, as expressed by the IPCC [7].
''Detection'' of a signal requires demonstrating that an observed change is statistically significantly different from that which can be explained by natural internal variability.
''Attribution'' requires demonstrating that a signal is:

★ unlikely to be due entirely to internal variability;

★ consistent with the estimated responses to the given combination of anthropogenic and natural forcing

★ not consistent with alternative, physically plausible explanations of recent climate change that exclude important elements of the given combination of forcings.
Detection does not imply attribution, and is easier than attribution. Unequivocal attribution would require controlled experiments with multiple copies of the climate system, which is not possible. Attribution, as described above, can therefore only be done within some margin of error. For example, the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report says "it is ''extremely likely'' that human activities have exerted a substantial net warming influence on climate since 1750," where "extremely likely" indicates a probability greater than 95%.^[3]
Following the publication of the Third Assessment Report (TAR) in 2001, "detection and attribution" of climate change has remained an active area of research. Some important results include:

★ A review of detection and attribution studies by the International Ad Hoc Detection and Attribution Group^[17] found that "natural drivers such as solar variability and volcanic activity are at most partially responsible for the large-scale temperature changes observed over the past century, and that a large fraction of the warming over the last 50 yr can be attributed to greenhouse gas increases. Thus, the recent research supports and strengthens the IPCC Third Assessment Report conclusion that 'most of the global warming over the past 50 years is likely due to the increase in greenhouse gases.'"

★ Multiple independent reconstructions of the temperature record of the past 1000 years confirm that the late 20th century is probably the warmest period in that time

★ Two papers in Science in August 2005 ^{[18] [19]} resolve the problem, evident at the time of the TAR, of tropospheric temperature trends. The UAH version of the record contained errors, and there is evidence of spurious cooling trends in the radiosonde record, particularly in the tropics. See satellite temperature measurements for details; and the 2006 US CCSP report ^[20].

★ Barnett and colleagues ^[21] say that the observed warming of the oceans "cannot be explained by natural internal climate variability or solar and volcanic forcing, but is well simulated by two anthropogenically forced climate models," concluding that "it is of human origin, a conclusion robust to observational sampling and model differences" ^[22]

★ Bratcher and Giese ^[23] observed conditions that "could be an indication of a climate regime shift to pre-1976 conditions." Bratcher and Giese conclude: "The results presented here do not preclude the possibility that anthropogenic sources of greenhouse gases have contributed to global warming. However the results do indicate that the human forced portion of global warming may be less than previously described."

Scientific literature and opinion

Some examples of published and informal support for the consensus view:

★ The attribution of climate change is discussed extensively, with references to peer-reviewed research, in chapter 12 of the IPCC TAR, which discusses The Meaning of Detection and Attribution, Quantitative Comparison of Observed and Modelled Climate Change, Pattern Correlation Methods and Optimal Fingerprint Methods.

★ An essay [13] in ''Science'' surveyed 928 abstracts related to climate change, and concluded that most journal reports accepted the consensus. This is discussed further in scientific opinion on climate change.

★ A recent paper (Estimation of natural and anthropogenic contributions to twentieth century temperature change, Tett SFB et al., JGR 2002), says that "Our analysis suggests that the early twentieth century warming can best be explained by a combination of warming due to increases in greenhouse gases and natural forcing, some cooling due to other anthropogenic forcings, and a substantial, but not implausible, contribution from internal variability. In the second half of the century we find that the warming is largely caused by changes in greenhouse gases, with changes in sulphates and, perhaps, volcanic aerosol offsetting approximately one third of the warming." [14]

★ In 1996, in a paper in ''Nature'' titled "A search for human influences on the thermal structure of the atmosphere", Benjamin D. Santer et al. wrote: "The observed spatial patterns of temperature change in the free atmosphere from 1963 to 1987 are similar to those predicted by state-of-the-art climate models incorporating various combinations of changes in carbon dioxide, anthropogenic sulphate aerosol and stratospheric ozone concentrations. The degree of pattern similarity between models and observations increases through this period. It is likely that this trend is partially due to human activities, although many uncertainties remain, particularly relating to estimates of natural variability." This earlier work only addressed the most recent period. Estimates of natural variability matter for assessing the significance of the trend.

★ Some scientists noted for their somewhat skeptical view of global warming accept that recent climate change is mostly anthropogenic. John Christy has said that he supports the American Geophysical Union (AGU) declaration, and is convinced that human activities are the major cause of the global warming that has been measured. [15]
Some scientists do disagree with the consensus: see list of scientists opposing global warming consensus. For example Willie Soon and Richard Lindzen^[24] say that there is insufficient proof for anthropogenic attribution. Generally this position requires new physical mechanisms to explain the observed warming; for example "Climate hypersensitivity to solar forcing?", Soon W et al., 2000, Annales Geophysicae-Atmospheres Hydrospheres and Space Sciences 18(5).

Findings that complicate attribution to CO₂

Warming sometimes leads CO₂ increases

Factors other than increased CO₂ concentrations can initiate warming or cooling episodes (see e.g., orbital forcing). The ice core record shows that on some occasions temperature starts rising hundreds of years before CO₂ increases.^{[25] [26]} Such results confirm that the relationship between CO₂ and climate can go in both directions: changes in CO₂ concentrations affect climate, while changes in climate can affect CO₂ concentrations. One proposed mechanism for this effect is increased release of sequestered CO₂ from oceans as circulation patterns shift, perhaps abruptly, in response to climate change.^{[27] [28]}
A more speculative and polemical inference sometimes drawn is that the causal relationship between temperature rises and global CO₂ concentrations are only one-way, so that historical increases in CO₂ have been nothing more than the product of independently rising temperatures.[16] However, a strictly "one-way" view of the relationship between CO₂ and temperature contradicts basic results in physics, specifically the fact that the absorption and emission of infrared radiation by CO₂ increases as its atmospheric concentration increases.^[29][30]
First principles as well as empirical observation suggest that positive feedbacks from CO₂ concentrations amplify warming initially caused by other factors:

Close analysis of the relationship between the two curves [i.e., temperature and CO₂] shows that, within the uncertainties of matching their timescales, the temperature led by a few centuries. This is expected, since it was changes in the Earth’s orbital parameters (including the shape of its orbit around the Sun, and the tilt of Earth’s axis) that caused the small initial temperature rise. This then raised atmospheric CO2 levels, in part by outgassing from the oceans, causing the temperature to rise further. By amplifying each other’s response, this “positive feedback” can turn a small initial perturbation into a large climate change. There is therefore no surprise that the temperature and CO2 rose in parallel, with the temperature initially in advance. In the current case, the situation is different, because human actions are raising the CO2 level, and we are starting to observe the temperature response. [17]

Present CO₂ levels greatly exceed the range found in the ice core data. Isotopic analysis of atmospheric CO₂ confirms that fossil fuel burning is the source of most of the CO₂ increase, unlike during prior interglacial periods.^[31] As noted above, models that include increased CO₂ levels when simulating recent climate match the observed data far better than those that do not.[18]

Solar variation

In the last 10 years evidence of local or planetary warming has been observed on Mars ^[32], Pluto ^[33], Jupiter ^[34], and Neptune's largest moon Triton ^[35]. It has sometimes been asserted in the popular press that this points to a solar explanation for the recent warming on Earth^[36]. Physicist K.I. Abdusamatov claims that solar variation has caused global warming on Earth, and that the coincident warmings "can only be a straightline consequence of the effect of the one same factor: a long-time change in solar irradiance."^[37] This view is not accepted by other scientists.^[38] Instead, scientific opinion is that these changes are caused by other factors, such as orbital irregularities or (in the case of Mars) changes in albedo as a result of dust storms^[39].

Footnotes

1. Working Group I: The Physical Basis for Climate Change
2. IPCC (italics in original)
3. Working Group I: The Physical Basis for Climate Change (italics in original)
4. Working Group I: The Physical Basis for Climate Change
5. Working Group I: The Physical Basis for Climate Change
6. Kyoto Protocol retrieved 26 jun 2007
7. Working Group I: The Physical Basis for Climate Change TS p. 26
8. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change retrieved 26 June 2007
9. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change retrieved 26 June 2007
10. Food and Agricultural Organization of the U.N. retrieved 27 jun 2007
11. Food and Agricultural Organization of the U.N. retrieved 25 jun 2007
12. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ret. 26 June 2007
13. "Aerosols and Climate" retrieved 26 jun 2007
14. IPCC
15. IPCC Working Group 1 Report: The Physical Basis of Climate Change. Technical Summary. retrieved 26 jun 2007
16. Working Group I: The Physical Basis for Climate Change (italics in original)
17. [8]
18. [9]
19. [10]
20. [11]
21. Barnett et al. "Penetration of Human-Induced Warming into the World's Oceans" (Science, Vol 309, Issue 5732, 284-287
22. [12].
23. Bratcher and Giese, 2002, ''"Tropical Pacific decadal variability and global warming"'', Geophysical Research Letters, VOL. 29, NO. 19, 1918 abstract PDF requires subscription
24. Can increasing carbon dioxide cause climate change?", Lindzen RS, 1997, PNAS 94(16)
25. Atmospheric CO2 concentration from 60 to 20 kyr BP from the Taylor Dome ice core, Antarctica, , Andreas, Indermühle, Geophysical Research Letters,
26. Ice core records of atmospheric CO2 around the last three glacial terminations, , Hubertus, Fischer, Science,
27. Glacial – interglacial atmospheric CO2 change: a simple “hypsometric effect” on deep-ocean carbon sequestration?, , L.C., Skinner, Climate of the Past Discussions,
28. Glacial Cycles: Toward a New Paradigm, , Didier, Paillard, Reviews of Geophysics,
29. An Introduction to Atmospheric Radiation (2nd ed), , K.N., Liou, Academic Press, 2002,

30. Flux emissivity tables for water vapor, carbon dioxide and ozone, , D.O., Staley, Journal of Applied Meteorology,

31. CO2 and the carbon cycle, pp.76-86 in Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change. J.T. Houghton, L.G. Meira Filho, B.A. Callander, N. Harris, A. Kattenberg and K. Maskell (eds), Cambridge University Press 1996., , D., Schimel, ,
32. [19]
33. [20]
34. [21]
35. [22]
36. Sun to Blame for Global Warming - National Center for Public Policy Research
37. Look to Mars for the truth on global warming
38. Planetary physicist Colin Wilson responded, "His views are completely at odds with the mainstream scientific opinion," and climate scientist Amato Evan stated, "the idea just isn't supported by the theory or by the observations"[23]. Charles Long of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, who studies radiative transfer, says "That's nuts...It doesn't make physical sense that that's the case."[24] Jay Pasachoff, an astronomy professor at Williams College, said that Pluto's global warming was "likely not connected with that of the Earth. The major way they could be connected is if the warming was caused by a large increase in sunlight. But the solar constant—the amount of sunlight received each second—is carefully monitored by spacecraft, and we know the Sun's output is much too steady to be changing the temperature of Pluto."[25]
39.

References

★ Le Quéré, ''How much of the recent ''CO₂'' increase is due to human activities?'', 2005 [26]

See also

External links

★ RealClimate - Blog on current climate change issues by active climatologists

★ "The Climate of Man", ''The New Yorker'' (2005): Part 1, Part 2, Part 3

★ Anthropogenic or Solar? by Shaviv

★ US EPA climate change and global warming website