Discover

:''This page is about the economic historian Arnold Toynbee; for the universal historian Arnold Joseph Toynbee see this article. For other persons named Toynbee and related topics see the disambiguation page Toynbee.''
'Arnold Toynbee' (August 23, 1852 – March 9, 1883) was an English economic historian also noted for his social commitment and desire to improve the living conditions of the working class.

Contents

Biography

''Lectures on the Industrial Revolution in England''

Social commitment

Works

External links

Biography

Toynbee was born in London as the son of the physician Joseph Toynbee, a pioneering otolaryngologist in his time; the more famous universal historian Arnold Joseph Toynbee (1889-1975), with whom he is often confused, was his nephew. Toynbee attended public schools in Blackheath and Woolwich. In 1873 he began to study political economy at Oxford, first at Pembroke College and from 1875 at Balliol College, where he went on to teach after his graduation in 1878. His lectures on the history of the Industrial Revolution in 18th and 19th century Britain proved widely influential; in fact, Toynbee coined, or at least effectively popularised, the term "Industrial Revolution" in the Anglophone world—in Germany and elsewhere it had been brought into circulation earlier by Friedrich Engels, also under the impression of the industrial changes in Britain. Toynbee died at age 30 in 1883, after his health had rapidly deteriorated probably due to exhaustion by excessive work. He married Charlotte Atwood, who was 12 years his senior, and a cousin of Harold F. Davidson, the famous rector of Stiffkey.

''Lectures on the Industrial Revolution in England''

A collection of Toynbee's lectures was published posthumously in 1884 and soon became a classic of British economic history. In them, Toynbee reconstructs the theories of Adam Smith, Thomas Malthus, and David Ricardo in their respective historic contexts and ''vice versa''. He generally argued for a stronger historical orientation in the interpretation of economic developments, and criticised economics as too abstract and deductive. For example, the reason ''"why one-half of the land in the United Kingdom is owned by 2512 persons"'' could only be understood in a historical perspective.
At the same time, Toynbee warned not to dismiss deductive economics altogether in favour of the historical approach; rather, deductive theory and historical empiricism needed to influence each other, as economic knowledge also enables a deeper understanding of historical developments. Toynbee criticised ''"party historians"'' because ''"they seek to read into the past the controversies of the present"''. Instead, according to Toynbee, one ''"must pursue facts for their own sake, but penetrated with a vivid sense of the problems of your own time"''.
Also, according to Toynbee, applying the historical method in economics would reveal how supposedly universal economic laws were in fact relative. For example, he argued that, in spite of commonly held beliefs, free trade was not generally advantageous in itself, but only under certain circumstances which should not be considered absolute. Toynbee considered few laws as universally true, such as the law of diminishing returns. Therefore, there were no universal rules as to how strongly the state should interfere into the market, either; depending on the situation, different degrees of regulation could be appropriate.
Another idea Toynbee dismissed was to consider free competition as universally beneficial to economic and societal progress, especially as reflected in its apotheosis in Social Darwinism, which promotes laissez-faire capitalism. Toynbee suggests to distinguish between ''"a struggle for mere existence and a struggle for a particular kind of existence."'' From the very beginning of history, he argues, all human civilization was essentially designed to "''interfere with this brute struggle. We intend to modify the violence of the fight, and to prevent the weak being trampled under foot."'' Although economic competition does have its advantages, being the driving force behind technical progress, these were ''"gained at the expense of an enormous waste of human life and labour, which might be avoided by regulation."'' Toynbee suggests to differentiate between competition in production on the one hand, and competition in the distribution of goods on the other hand: "''[...] the struggle of men to outvie one another in production is beneficial to the community; their struggle over the division of the joint produce is not. The stronger side will dictate its own terms; and as a matter of fact, in the early days of competition the capitalists used all their power to oppress the labourers, and drove down wages to starvation point. This kind of competition has to be checked; there is no historical instance of its having lasted long without being modified either by combination or legislation, or both. In England both remedies are in operation, the former through Trades Unions, the latter through factory legislation."'' In itself, a market based on competition was neither good nor bad, but like ''"a stream whose strength and direction have to be observed, that embankments may be thrown up within which it may do its work harmlessly and beneficially"''. However, in the early phase of industrial capitalism ''"it came to be believed in as a gospel, [...] from which it was regarded as little short of immoral to depart"''.
He was the first to historically identify and name the British "Industrial Revolution." His analysis of monopolies and oligopolies was prescient. He was a thorough historicist and adhered to the inductive method.

Social commitment

For Toynbee, early industrial capitalism and the situation of the working class in it was not only a subject of ivory-tower studies; he was actively involved in improving the living conditions of the proletariat. He read for workers in large industrial centres and encouraged the creation of trade unions and co-operatives. A focal point of his commitment was the slum of Whitechapel in East London, where he helped to establish public libraries for the working class population. Toynbee also encouraged his students to offer free courses for working class audiences in their own neighbourhoods.
Inspired by Toynbee's ideas, Samuel Augustus Barnett and Henrietta Barnett founded the first university settlement in 1884, shortly after his death, which was named Toynbee Hall in his honour and still exists today. The concept to bring upper and middle class students into lower class neighbourhoods, not only to provide education and social aid, but to actually live and work together with their inhabitants, soon inspired a worldwide movement of university settlements. The idea was to help members of the future elite understand the problems of British society; this was especially important at a time when class divisions were much stronger, social mobility was minimal, and the living conditions of the poor were completely unknown to many members of the upper class. Toynbee Hall attracted many students, especially from Wadham College and Balliol College where Toynbee had taught.

Works

★ 1884: ''Lectures On The Industrial Revolution In England''. Whitefish, Montana: Kessinger Publishing (paperback edition 2004). ISBN 1-4191-2952-X

★ 1976: ''CHOOSE LIFE-A DIALOGUE''. Arnold Toynbee and Daisaku Ikeda. New York: Oxford University Press (paperback edition 1984). ISBN 0-19-283065-1

External links

★ McMaster University, Archive for the History of Economic Thought - full text of ''Lectures On The Industrial Revolution In England''

★ toynbeehall.org.uk - Toynbee Hall official website

★ SocioSite: Toynbee links