In
linguistics, 'agglutination' is the
morphological process of adding
affixes to the
base of a
word. Languages that use agglutination widely are called
agglutinative languages. These languages are often contrasted with
fusional languages and
isolating languages. However, both fusional and isolating languages may use agglutination in the most-often-used constructs, and use agglutination heavily in certain contexts, such as word derivation. This is the case in
English, which is an isolating language, but has an agglutinated plural marker ''-(e)s'' and derived words such as ''shame·less·ness''.
Agglutinative suffixes are often inserted irrespective of
syllabic boundaries, for example, by adding a consonant to the
syllable coda as in English ''tie — tie's'''. Native speakers of strongly agglutinating languages untrained in linguistics cannot usually break down an agglutinated word into its components. Agglutinative languages also have large inventories of
enclitics, too, which can be and are separated from the word root by native speakers in daily usage.
Examples of agglutinative languages
Main articles: Agglutinative language
Examples of European agglutinative languages are the
Finno-Ugric languages, such as
Finnish,
Estonian and
Hungarian. These have highly agglutinated expressions in daily usage, and most words are bisyllablic or longer. Grammatical information expressed by
adpositions in Western
Indo-European languages is typically found in suffixes. For example, the Finnish word ''talossanikin'' means "in my house, too". Derivation can also be quite complex. For example, Finnish ''epäjärjestelmällisyys'' has the root ''järki'' "logos", and consists of negative-"
logos"-
causative-
frequentative-
nominalizer-
adessive-"related to"-"property", and means "the property of being unsystematic," "unsystematicalness." The word has lots of stem changes, so Finnish is not the best example for an agglutinative language.
Agglutination is used very heavily in some
Native American languages, such as
Quechua and
K'iche, where one word can contain enough
morphemes to convey the meaning of what would be a complex
sentence in other languages.
Agglutination is also a common feature in the native language of the
Basque people, the ancient
Euskara tongue which has likely been spoken by the Euskaldun (native Basque speakers) for at least 20,000 years.
Almost all of the
Philippine languages also belong to this category. This enables them, especially
Filipino, to form new words from simple base forms.
Japanese is also an agglutinating language, adding information such as
negation, passive
voice, past
tense,
honorific degree and
causality in the verb form. Common examples would be ''hatarakaseraretara'' (働かせられたら), meaning "if (subject) had been made to work...", and ''tabetakunakatta'' (食べたくなかった), which means "(subject) did not want to eat".
Turkish is yet another agglutinating language: the expression ''Avustralyalılaştıramadıklarımızdanmışsınız'' is pronounced as one word in Turkish, but it can be translated into English as "supposedly you are one of those whom we could not make Australian."
Extremes of agglutination
It is possible to construct artificial extreme examples of agglutination, which have no real use, but illustrate the theoretical capability of the grammar to agglutinate. This is not a question of "long words", since some languages permit limitless combinations with compound words, negative clitics or such, which can be (and are) expressed with an analytic structure in actual usage.
The English language, missing inflectional agglutination, can use only derivational Latin agglutination, as in e.g. ''
antidisestablishmentarianism''. Agglutinative languages often have more complex derivational agglutination than isolating languages, so they can do the same to a much larger extent. For example, in Hungarian, a word such as ''elnemzetietleníthetetlenségnek'', which means "for [the purposes of] undenationalizationability" can find actual use. Using inflectional agglutination, these can be extended. For example, the official Guinness world record is Finnish ''epäjärjestelmällistyttämättömyydellänsäkäänköhän'' "Wonder if he can also ... with his capability of not causing things to be unsystematic". It has the derived word ''epäjärjestelmällistyttämättömyys'' as the root and is lengthened with the inflectional endings ''-llänsäkäänköhän''. However, this word is grammatically unusual, since ''-kään'' "also" is used only in negative clauses, but ''-kö'' (question) only in question clauses.
See also
★
Affix
★
Noun adjunct
★
Word formation
★
Agglutinative language