Member Login
Username:Password:
or Sign up here
Discover

FEMTOCELL

(Redirected from Access point base station)
A 'femtocell'—originally called an 'Access Point Base Station'—is a scalable, multi-channel, two-way communication device extending a typical base station by incorporating all of the major components of the telecommunications infrastructure. A typical example is a UMTS access point base station containing a Node-B, RNC and GSN, with only an Ethernet or broadband connection (less commonly, ATM/TDM) to the Internet or an intranet. Application of VoIP allows such a unit to provide voice and data services in the same way as a normal base station, but with the deployment simplicity of a Wi-Fi access point. Other examples include CDMA-2000 and WiMAX solutions.
The main benefits of an Access Point Base Station is the existential simplicity of ultra low cost, scalable deployment. Design studies have shown that access point base stations can be designed to scale from simple hot-spot coverage through to large deployments by racking such units into full-scale base-stations.
The claimed attractions for a cellular operator are that these devices can increase both capacity and coverage while reducing both capex and opex.
Access Point Base Stations are stand-alone units that are typically deployed in hot-spots, in-building and even in-home. Variations include attaching a Wi-Fi router to allow a Wi-Fi hot-spot to work as backhaul for a cellular hotspot, or vice versa.
Femtocells are an alternative way to deliver the benefits of Fixed Mobile Convergence. The distinction is that most FMC architectures require a new (dual-mode) handset, while a femtocell-based deployment will work with existing handsets.
As a result, Access Point Base Stations must work with handsets that are compliant with existing RAN technologies. The reuse of existing RAN technologies (and potentially re-use of existing frequency channels) could create problems, since the additional femtocell transmitters represent a large number of interference sources, potentially resulting in significant operational challenges for existing deployments. This is one of the biggest areas that femtocells must overcome if they are to be successful.
Access Point Base Stations typically rely on the Internet for connectivity, which can potentially reduce deployment costs but introduces security risks that generally do not exist in typical cellular systems.

Contents
History
Issues
Spectrum
Access control
Lawful interception
Equipment location
Network integration
Privacy
Emergency calls
Quality of service
Spectrum accuracy
Handover
Market
Equipment to chipset mapping
Reported market estimates
Target product cost
References
External links
Equipment
Software stacks
Chips and reference designs
Industry body

History


In 2002, a group of engineers at Motorola in Swindon, UK, started a skunkworks team, called the AFG, to develop new technologies. Some of their major achievements included the world's smallest full-power UMTS base station, one of the first demonstrations of television to mobile, and the invention and development of the access point base station.
By 2005, a number of companies were looking to focus on this market, including Airwalk, ip. Access, RadioFrame Networks and Ubiquisys. By 2007, the idea had become more mainstream, with a number of companies publicly demonstrating systems at 3GSM, and operators announcing trials. However, to date, no large-scale deployments have been made.
As well as system manufacturers, semiconductor companies have announced chip-level products to address this application. Analog Devices has discussed the subject, while picoChip claims significant commercial traction.

Issues


Although claims are made that Access Point Base Stations could be a panacea for straightforward system deployment, there are a number of complications that need to be overcome.
Spectrum

Crucially, access point base-stations operate in licensed spectrum. As licensed spectrum allocation is made to operators on a fee basis, deployment of equipment must meet the strict requirements of the licenses. To make best use of spectrum, operators use frequency and cellular planning tools to optimise the best coverage for a given amount of spectrum. The introduction of access point base stations using licensed spectrum that are sold directly to the customer has implications for frequency and cellular planning, since an unexpectedly located access point base station could interfere with other closely-located base stations.
Access control

There is also the related issue of what happens when a neighbor's mobile appliance attaches to the network using another neighbor's femtocell, or how that can be prevented from occurring.
Lawful interception

Access point base stations, in common with all other public communications systems, are, in most countries, required to comply with lawful interception requirements.
Equipment location

Other regulatory issues6 relate to the requirement in most countries for the operator of a network to be able to show exactly where each base-station is located, and for E911 requirements to provide the registered location of the equipment to the emergency services. There are issues in this regard for access point base stations sold to consumers for home installation, for example. Further, a consumer might try to carry their basestation with them to a new location. This could cause problems if the device were carried to a region or country where it is not licensed. Some manufacturers (see Ubicell) are using GPS within the equipment to lock the femtocell when it is moved to a different location or country1.
Network integration

From an operational or deployment perspective, one of the key areas that still needs to be considered is that of network integration. The conventional cellular network is designed to support a relatively small number (thousands, tens-of-thousands) of basestatations. A femtocell deployment of millions of access points will require a different architecture to support this scaling. Some people have proposed UMA architecture approaches2, while others propose SIP architectures. In one of the original Motorola Access Point Base Station designs produced by the AFG, the unit only supported packet switched calls and thus contained an SGSN instead of an MSC. This architecture either utilised packet-switched calls or used a VoIP client on the phone (c.f. 'Fring'). Packets were carried through to the backhaul Ethernet/ADSL connection, thus removing the need for typical cellular core network functions and making it simple to deploy.
Privacy

There is a potential privacy issue with femtocells, in that a mobile appliance will camp-on to the femtocell when close by. Since the target market is in-business (SOHO) or at-home femtocell deployment, the operating company can potentially determine when a person is at home or at the office. On the one hand, this raises all sorts of interesting new marketing opportunities, such as learning more about a person's habits in order to improve targeted marketing, whilst, on the other hand, it has the potential to infringe privacy; the debate has yet to play out in this market.
Emergency calls

Access Point Base Stations are also required, since carrying voice calls, to provide a 911 (or 999, or 112) emergency service, as is the case for VoIP phone providers6. This service must meet the same requirements for availability as current wired telephone systems. There are several ways to achieve this, such as alternative power sources or fall-back to existing telephone infrastructure.
Quality of service

When utilising an Ethernet or ADSL home backhaul connection, an Access Point Base Station must either share the backhaul bandwidth with other services, such as Internet, games machines, set-top boxes and triple-play equipment in general, or alternatively directly replace these functions within an integrated unit. In shared-bandwidth approaches, which are the majority of designs currently being developed, the effect on QoS does not appear to have been discussed.
Spectrum accuracy

To meet FCC/RA spectrum mask requirements, Access Point Base Stations must generate the RF signal with a high degree of precision, typically around 50 parts-per-billion (ppb) or better. To do this over a long period of time is a major technical challenge, since meeting this accuracy over a period longer than perhaps 12 months requires an ovenised crystal oscillator (OCXO). These oscillators are generally large and expensive, and still require calibration in the 12-to-24 month timeframe. Use of lower-cost temperature-compensated oscillators (TCXO) provides accuracy over only a 6-to-18 month timeframe. Both depend on a number of factors.
The solutions to this problem of maintaining accuracy are either to make the units disposable/replaceable after an 18-month period and thus keep the cost of the system low, or to use an external, accurate signal to constantly calibrate the oscillator to ensure it maintains its accuracy3. This is not simple (broadband backhaul introduces issues of network jitter/wander and recovered clock accuracy), but technologies such as the IEEE 1588 time synchronisation standard may address the issue, potentially providing 100-nanosecond accuracy (standard deviation)4, depending on the location of the master clock. Conventional (macrocell) basestations often use GPS timing for synchronization and this could be used to calibrate the oscillator1. However, for a domestic femtocell, there are concerns on cost and the difficulty of enuring good GPS coverage.
Handover

In order to ensure that the user gets the best data rate out of the system, the mobile appliance must somehow know to connect to the femtocell when within range, even if there is still sufficient signal from, for example, an external macrocell base station. Forcing the mobile appliance to do this, whilst preventing your neighbor's mobile appliance from doing the same, is quite a challenge. In addition, handoff from the femtocell to the wider area macrocell and back again is potentially quite complex.

Market


Equipment to chipset mapping


★ Airvana (acquired 3-way Networks, which was using Analog Devices BlackFin)

★ Airwalk

★ Alcatel-Lucent

★ Axiom Wireless: Picochip chipset

★ Ericsson

★ Huawei

★ ip.access: Picochip chipset

★ Nokia Siemens

★ RadioFrame Networks: CEVA-X1620(TM) DSP core

★ Samsung ZTE

★ Ubiquisys (Motorola5): Picochip chipset
Reported market estimates


"36 Million Femtocell Shipments Expected in 2012"

"We forecast 17 million residential Femtocells in Western Europe in 2011”

“By 2011 there are forecast to be 102 million femtocell users"

"3G femtocell deployment to 20% of households by 2012 would only save about USD20 per customer per year, because significant numbers of macrocells would still be needed"

"estimates that there will be 50,000 femtocell units shipped this year and 1 million units next year"

"market will be worth $2bn by 2011 "
Target product cost


"Under €150 in volume"

"Very aggressive price targets (<<$200)"

References



★ See also Wi-Fi Wireless access point

BBC News: Home Cells Signal Mobile Change

Reuters video news about femtocell

Netgear and Ubiquisys team to develop femtocell home gateway

Japan Softbank (formerly Vodafone Japan) conducts six month field trial with all leading vendors

Tatara Systems and picoChip partnership to collaborate on femtocell market

Google invests in femtocell vendor

O2 trial could see a picocell in every home

★ [1] Hands on with the Samsung Ubicell

★ [2] Ubiquisys and Kineto successfully test UMA for femtocells

★ [3] picoChip works with Semtech to enhance femtocell reference designs

★ [4] IEEE-1588 Standard for a precision clock synchronization protocol

★ [5] "Ubiquisys and Motorola responded to the RFP together, according to one industry source."

★ [6] FCC requirements for 911 provision by VoIP providers

External links


Equipment


3Way Networks Femtocell

Airvana Femtocell

Airwalk Femtocell

Alcatel-Lucent Femtocell

Axiom Wireless

Ericcsson Femtocell

Huawei Femtocell

ip.access Oyster Femtocell

Motorola Horizon-3Gi Femtocell

Nokia Siemens Networks' Femtocell

RadioFrame Networks Femtocell

Samsung Ubicell Femtocell

Ubiquisys Femtocell
Software stacks


Aricent Femtocell Software
Chips and reference designs


Picochip PC205 multi-standard baseband device: DSP + ARM9

ST Microelectronics GreenSIDE STW51000 multi-standard baseband device: DSP + ARM9

CEVA-XS1200 baseband device: CEVA DSP

Bitwave Semiconductor BWS1101 multi-band software defined transceiver 700MHz to 4.2GHz (currently at alpha release)

Terocelo Lycon(TM) RF chipset
Industry body


Femtocell Forum

This article provided by Wikipedia. To edit the contents of this article, click here for original source.