
Painting of a family game of checkers ("jeu des dames") by French artist
Louis-Léopold Boilly, c. 1803.

At the turn of the nineteenth century, women wore thin gauzy outer dresses while men adopted
trousers and overcoats. Rutger Jan Schimmelpenninck and his family, 1801-02.
'Fashion in the period 1795-1820' in
European and European-influenced countries saw the final triumph of undress or informal styles over the brocades, lace, periwigs, and powder of the earlier
eighteenth century. In the aftermath of the
French Revolution, no one in
France wanted to appear to be an
aristocrat, while in
Britain,
Beau Brummell introduced
trousers, perfect
tailoring, and unadorned, immaculate
linen as the ideals of men's fashion.
Women's fashions followed
classical ideals, and tightly laced
corsets were temporarily abandoned in favor of a high-waisted, natural figure.
Women's fashion

1811 dance dress
Dresses
In this period, fashionable women's clothing styles were based on the
Empire silhouette — dresses were closely-fitted to the torso just under the breasts, falling loosely below. In different contexts, such styles are commonly called "Directoire" (referring to the
Directory which ran France during the second half of the 1790s), "Empire" (referring to Napoleon's 1804-1814/1815 empire, and often also to his 1800-1804 "consulate"), or "
Regency" (most precisely referring to the 1811-1820 period of
George IV's formal regency, but often loosely used to refer to various periods between the 18th century and the Victorian).
These 1795-1820 fashions were quite different from the styles prevalent during most of the 18th century and the rest of the 19th century, when women's clothes were generally tight against the torso from the natural waist upwards, and heavily full-skirted below (often inflated by means of
hoop-skirts,
crinolines,
panniers,
bustles, etc.). The high waistline of 1795-1820 styles took attention away from the natural waist, so that there was then no point to the tight "wasp-waist" corseting often considered fashionable during other periods.
Inspired by neoclassical tastes, the short-waisted gowns sported soft, flowing skirts and were often made of white, almost transparent
muslin, which was easily washed and draped loosely like the garments on Greek and Roman statues. Thus during the 1795-1820 period, it was often possible for middle- and upper-class women to wear clothes that were not very confining or cumbersome, and still be considered decently and fashionably dressed.
Among middle- and upper-class women there was a somewhat basic distinction between "morning dress" (worn at home in the afternoons as well as mornings) and evening attire — generally, both men and women changed clothes in preparation for the evening meal and possible entertainments to follow. There were also further gradations such as afternoon dress, walking dress,
riding habits, travelling dress, dinner dress, etc.
In the ''Mirror of Graces; or the English Lady's Costume'', published in London in 1811, the author ("a Lady of Distinction") advised:
In the morning the arms and bosom must be completely covered to the throat and wrists. From the dinner-hour to the termination of the day, the arms, to a graceful height above the elbow, may be bare; and the neck and shoulders unveiled as far as delicacy will allow.
★ Morning dresses were worn inside the house. They were high-necked and long-sleeved, covering throat and wrists, and generally plain and devoid of decoration.
★ Ball gowns, or evening dresses, were often extravagantly trimmed and decorated with lace, ribbons, and netting. They were cut low and sported short sleeves, baring bosoms. Bared arms were covered by long white gloves. Our Lady of Distinction, however, cautions young women from displaying their bosoms beyond the boundaries of decency, saying, "The bosom and shoulders of a very young and fair girl may be displayed without exciting much displeasure or disgust."
A Lady of Distinction also advised young ladies to wear softer shades of color, such as pinks, periwinkle blue, or lilacs. The mature matron could wear fuller colors, such as purple, black, crimson, deep blue, or yellow.
Many women of this era remarked upon how being fully dressed meant the bosom and shoulders were bare, and yet being under-dressed would mean one's neckline went right up to one's chin.
Hairstyles and headgear

Artist Rolinda Sharples wears her hair in a mass of curls; her mother wears a sheer indoor cap, c. 1820.

Mme. Seriziat wears a straw bonnet trimmed with green ribbon over a lace mob cap, 1795.
During this period, the classical influence extended to hairstyles. Often masses of curls were worn over the forehead and ears, with the longer back hair drawn up into loose buns or ''Psyche knots'' influenced by Greek and Roman styles. By the later 1810s, front hair was parted in the center and worn in tight ringlets over the ears. A few adventurous women wore short hairstyles.
In the ''Mirror of Graces,'' a Lady of Distinction writes,
Now, easy tresses, the shining braid, the flowing ringlet confined by the ''antique'' comb, or bodkin, give graceful specimens of the simple taste of modern beauty. Nothing can correspond more elegantly with the untrammelled drapery of our newly-adopted classic raiment than this undecorated coiffure of nature.
Conservative married women continued to wear linen
mob caps, which now had wider brims at the sides to cover the ears. Fashionable women wore similar caps for morning (at home undress) wear.
No respectable woman would leave the house without a hat or
bonnet. On Wednesday, May 6, 1801, Jane Austen wrote to her sister, Cassandra:
My mother has ordered a new bonnet, and so have I: both white strip, trimmed with white ribbon. I find my straw bonnet looking very much like other people's and quite as smart. Bonnets of cambric muslin on the plan of Lady Bridges' are a good deal worn, and some of them are very pretty: but I shall defer one of that sort until your arrival.
Stepping outside with a bare head did happen on occasion. On September 15th, 1796, Jane Austen wrote, "We went in our two carriages to Nackington: but how we divided, I shall leave you to surmise, merely observing that as Eliz: and I were without hat or bonnet, it would not have been very convenient for us to go in the chair."
The antique head-dress, or Queen Mary ''
coiff'', Chinese hat, Oriental inspired turban, and Highland helmet were popular. As for bonnets, their crowns and brims were adorned with increasingly elaborate ornamentations, such as feathers and ribbons.
[1] In fact, ladies of the day embellished their hats frequently, replacing old decorations with new trims or feathers. On December 18, 1798, Jane Austen wrote her sister, Cassandra:
I took the liberty a few days ago of asking your black velvet bonnet to lend me its cawl, which it very readily did, and by which I have been enabled to give a considerable improvement of dignity to my cap, which was before too ''nidgetty'' to please me. I shall wear it on Thursday, but I hope you will not be offended with me for following your advice as to its ornaments only in part. I still venture to retain the narrow silver round it, put twice round without any bow, and instead of the black military feather shall put in the coquelicot one, as being smarter: and besides coquelicot is to be all the fashion this winter. After the ball, I shall probably make it entirely black...
Undergarments

1811 illustration of underclothes, showing one form of Regency "stays"
Fashionable women of the Regency Era wore several layers of
undergarments. The first was the
chemise, or shift, a thin garment with tight, short sleeves (and a low neckline if worn under evening wear), made of white cotton and finished with a plain hem that was shorter than the dress. These shifts were meant to protect the outerclothes from perspiration and were washed more frequently than outer clothes. In fact, washer women of the time used coarse soap when scrubbing these garments, then plunged them in boiling water. Hence, the absence of color, or lace or other embellishments, which would have faded or damaged the fabric under such rough treatment. Chemises and shifts also prevented the transparent
muslin or silk gowns from being too revealing.
The next layer is a
corset. However, high-waisted classical fashions required no corset for the slight of figure, and there were some experiments to produce garments which would serve the same functions as a modern bra. "Short stays" (corsets extending only a short distance below the breasts) were often worn over the shift or chemise (not directly next to the skin), and "long stays" (corsets extending down towards the natural waist) were worn by a minority of women trying to appear slimmer than they were (but even such long stays were not primarily intended to constrict the waist, in the manner of Victorian corsets.
The final layer was the
petticoat, which had a scooped neckline and was sleeveless, and was fitted in the back with hooks and
eyelets. These petticoats were often worn between the underwear and the outer dress. The lower edge of the petticoat was intended to be seen, since women would often lift their outer dresses to spare the relatively delicate material of the outer dress from mud or damp (so exposing only the coarser and cheaper fabric of the petticoat to risk). Often exposed to view, petticoats were decorated at the hem with rows of tucks or lace, or ruffles.
"Drawers" (underpants with short legs) were only beginning to be worn by a few women during this period. They were tied separately around the waist.
Stockings (
hosiery), made of silk or knitted cotton, were held up by
garters until
suspenders were introduced in the late 19th century.
In the ''Mirror of Graces'', a "divorce" was described as an undergarment that served to separate a woman's breasts. Made of steel or iron that was covered by a type of padding, and shaped like a triangle, this device was placed in the center of the chest.
Outerwear and shoes
Throughout the period, the
Indian
shawl was the favored wrap, as English town houses and the typical
English country house were generally draughty, and the sheer muslin and silk gowns popular during this era provided scant protection. Shawls were made of soft
cashmere or
silk or even
muslin for summer. Paisley patterns were extremely popular at the time.
[2]
Short (high-waisted) jackets called ''spencers'' were worn outdoors, along with long-hooded
cloaks, Turkish wraps, mantles, capes, Roman tunics,
chemisettes, and overcoats called ''pelisses''
[3](which were often sleeveless and reached down as far as the ankles). These outer garments were often made of double sarsnet, fine Merina cloth, or velvets, and trimmed with fur, such as swan's down, fox, chinchilla, or sable. On May 6, 1801, Jane Austen wrote her sister Cassandra, "Black gauze cloaks are worn as much as anything."
Thin, flat fabric (silk or velvet) or leather slippers were generally worn (as opposed to the high-heeled shoes of much of the eighteenth century).
Metal
pattens were strapped on shoes to protect them from rain or mud, raising the feet an inch or so off the ground.
Accessories

c.1813
Gloves were always worn outside the house. When worn inside, as when making a social call, or on formal occasions, such as a ball, they were removed when dining.
[4]About the length of the glove, A Lady of Distinction writes:
If the prevailing fashion be to reject the long sleeve, and to partially display the arm, let the glove advance considerably above the elbow, and there be fastened with a draw-string or armlet. But this should only be the case when the arm is muscular, coarse, or scraggy. When it is fair, smooth, and round, it will admit of the glove being pushed down to a little above the wrists.
Longer gloves were worn rather loosely during this period, crumpling below the elbow. As described in the passage above, longer gloves were fastened by "garters".
Reticules held personal items, such as
vinaigrettes. The form-fitting dresses or frocks of the day had no pockets, thus these small drawstring handbags were essential.
Parasols (as shown in the illustration) protected a lady's skin from the sun, and were considered an important fashion accessory. Slender and light in weight, they came in a variety of shapes, colors, and sizes.
Fans, made of paper or silk on sticks of ivory and wood, and printed with oriental motifs or popular scenes of the era, were used by fashionable ladies (and gentlemen) to cool themselves and enhance gestures and body language. These ubiquitous accessories were constructed in a variety of shapes and styles, such as pleated or rigid. Fans and their use in body language and communication are described in this information sheet from the Cheltenham Museum (click and scroll to page 4).
[5]
Directoire (1795-1799)

1799 portrait of Mme. de Verninac by
Jacques-Louis David, showing the late 1790s Parisian high Greek look

An idealized classicized depiction of an English Regency domestic scene
By the early-to-mid 1790s, several influences had combined to produce a certain simplification in women's clothes: aspects of Englishwomen's practical country outdoors wear leaked upwards into high fashion, there was a reaction in revolutionary France against the ornately cumbersome aristocratic style of dress of the former royal regime (see
1750-1795 in fashion), and the aesthetic of
Neo-classicism began to be applied (it was associated in France with ideas of ancient Athenian and Roman "republican virtue"). Also, a simplification of the attire worn by preteen girls in the 1780s (who were no longer required to wear ) probably prepared the way for the simplification of the attire worn by teenage girls and adult women in the 1790s. Waistlines became somewhat high by 1795, but skirts were still rather full, and neo-classical influences were not yet dominant.
It was during the second half of the 1790s that fashionable women in France began to adopt a thoroughgoing Classical style, based on an idealized version of ancient Greek and Roman dress (or what was thought at the time to be ancient Greek and Roman dress), with narrow clinging skirts. Some of the extreme Parisian versions of the neo-classical style (such as narrow straps which bared the shoulders, and diaphanous gowns without sufficient stays, petticoats, or shifts worn beneath) were not widely adopted elsewhere, but many features of the late-1790s neo-classical style were broadly influential, surviving in successively modified forms in European fashions over the next two decades.
White was considered the most suitable color for neo-classical clothing (accessories were often in contrasting colors). Short trains trailing behind were common in dresses of the late 1790s.
Directoire gallery
# of the Frankland sisters by
John Hoppner gives an idea of the styles of 1795.
# by William Blake.
Blake is not a typical neo-classicist, but this shows a somewhat similar idealization of antiquity (as well as predicting the future high fashions of the late 1790s).
# showing woman and girl wearing elegantly-simple high-waisted styles, which are not strongly neoclassical, however.
# of Gabrielle Josephine du Pont.
#, showing a lady who seems none too warmly attired for a balloon journey in her low-cut thin-looking directoire gown.
# of white directoire gown worn with contrasting red shawl with Greek key border.
# of a day outfit with short "spencer" jacket (less neo-classical, though still following the empire silhouette).
# of 1799. The habit on the right features a short jacket with tails. The green habit on the left may be a
redingote rather than a jacket and petticoat.
Caricatures
#, a February 8th 1796 caricature engraved by
Isaac Cruikshank (father of
George) after a drawing by George M. Woodward. (In 1796, strongly neoclassically-influenced styles were still very new in England.) Notice the single vertical feather springing from the hair of the 1796 woman.
#, a highly-stylized parody which caricatures women's feather headdresses and dandies' tight trousers, among other things.
#, an over-the-top caricature by Isaac Cruikshank of allegedly excessively diaphanous styles worn in late 1790s Paris.
Empire (1800-1815)

English and French fashions, 1815. The morning dress has back gathers and long sleeves, and like the walking costume, has trim at the hemline and new detail at the upper sleeve.
During the first two decades of the nineteenth century, fashions continued to follow the basic high-waisted
empire silhouette, but in other respects neoclassical influences became progressively diluted. (In many countries, the strictest or most uncompromising versions of the neoclassical style were never quite as popular as in Paris.) Gowns remained narrow in front, but fullness at the raised back waist allowed room to walk. Colors other than white came into style, the fad for diaphanous outer fabrics faded (except in certain formal contexts), and some elements of obvious visible ornamentation came back into use in the design of the gown (as opposed to the elegant simplicity or subtle white-on-white embroidery of the gown of ca. 1800).
Empire gallery
# of mother and son by
John Vanderlyn.
# Mob cap of c. 1805 is pleated in the front and has a narrow frilled brim that widens to cover the ears. America.
# wears a gown with a sheer top layer over a partial lining and a patterned shawl. She wears a gold armlet on her left arm. Her hair is styled in loose curls at the temples and over her ears. Massachusetts, 1809.
# dancing dress worn with elbow-length gloves.
# ball gown, shown with elbow-length gloves.
# of woman in "Schute" bonnet and blue-striped dress with flounces.
# of a woman by Henri Mulard, ca. 1810.
# wears a simple white satin gown and the ubiquitous shawl. Her headress is trimmed with ostrich plumes.
Caricatures
#, a caricature purporting to show the provocative and revealing character of 1807 fashions as compared to those of the 18th century (deliberately exaggerating the contrast).
#, 1810 caricature by
Gillray. A satire of clinging gowns worn with few layers of petticoats beneath.
Regency (1810-1820)
Jane Austen describes the dress she is wearing on March 9, 1814, to her sister Cassandra:
I wear my gauze gown today, long sleeves and all: I shall see how they succeed, but as yet I have no reason to suppose long sleeves are allowable. I have lowered the bosom especially at the corners, and plaited black satin ribbon round the top. Such will be my costume of vine leaves and paste ...
During the second half of the 1810s, a somewhat conical silhouette (slightly stiffened by layers of petticoats) began to be preferred (as opposed to the earlier narrow and clinging skirts), and decoration (sometimes heavy and elaborate) was often applied near the hem of the dress, preparing the way for the transition to
1820s styles.
Regency gallery
# — probably more realistic to the everyday wear of
Jane Austen's characters than most fashion-plates.
# and her daughter wear their hair parted in the front center with tight ringlets over each ear; back hair is brushed back into a bun. 1816.
#, showing the beginning of the trend towards a conical silhouette.
# is heavily trimmed and tasseled.